At this time the Quakers were not
united as a body, and consequently, there was no test of character nor rules of
discipline for those who assumed that name. They were very dissimilar men to
their quiet and unobtrusive descendants. The markets, fairs, and every public
concourse were attended by them, denouncing false weights and measures,
drunkenness and villainy, with the curses of the Almighty, calling upon the
people, frequently with furious and fearful energy and powerful eloquence, to
repent, and cry unto God, that his mercy might be extended to the salvation of
their immortal souls. their zeal led them to many breaches of good manners.
They would enter churches, and
after the service, when the quiet folks were thinking of gratifying their
bodies with a substantial dinner, they were arrested by the violent declamation
of a man or woman, frequently denouncing the priest as being the blind leading
the blind. This naturally led to a scene of riot and confusion, in which the
Quakers were in many cases handled with great barbarity. among these disturbers
were mingled persons of bad character. The violence of sectarian feeling in the
churches thus disturbed, made no discrimination between bad and good; they were
equally subjected to the roughest treatment.
Bunyan attacked those who denied
that Christ had appeared in the world as Emmanuel, God with us 'in fashion as a
man,' that by the infinite merits of his life and death imputed to believers,
they might be made holy. His attack was also directed against those who refused
obedience to the written Word, or who relied upon inward light in
contradistinction and preference to the Bible. The title to Burrough's answer
is a strange contrast to the violence of his language—The Gospel of Peace
Contended for in the Spirit of Meekness and Love. In this spirit of meekness he
calls his opponents 'crafty fowlers preying upon the innocent'; and lovingly
exclaims, 'How long shall the righteous be a prey to your teeth, ye subtle
foxes; your dens are in darkness, and your mischief is hatched upon your beds
of secret whoredoms.' The unhallowed spirit of the age mistook abuse for
argument, and harsh epithets for faithful dealing.
Bunyan replied in A Vindication of Gospel Truths, to the great satisfaction of all his friends; and although Burrough answered this tract also, Bunyan very wisely allowed his railing opponent to have the last word, and applied his great powers to more important labors than caviling with one who in reality did not differ with him. The Quaker had been seriously misled by supposing that the Baptist was a hireling preacher, and we must be pleased that he was so falsely charged because it elicited a crushing reply. Burrough, in reply to an imputation made by Bunyan, that the Quakers were the false prophets alluded to in Scripture, observed that 'in those days there was not a Quaker heard of.' 'Friend,' replied Bunyan, 'thou hast rightly said, there was not a Quaker heard of indeed, though there were many Christians heard of then.
Again, to defend thyself thou throwest the
dirt in my face, saying, If we should diligently trace thee, we should find
thee in the steps of the false prophets, through fancied words, through
covetousness, making merchandise of souls, loving the wages of
unrighteousness.' To which Bunyan replied; 'Friend, dost thou speak this as
from thy own knowledge, or did any other tell thee so? However, that spirit
that led thee out this way is a lying spirit; for though I be poor, and of no
repute in the world as to outward things, yet through grace I have learned, by
the example of the apostle, to preach the truth, and also to work with my
hands, both for mine own living, and for those that are with me, when I have the opportunity.
And I trust that the Lord Jesus,
who hath helped me to reject the wages of unrighteousness hitherto, will also
help me still so that I shall distribute that which God hath given me freely,
and not for filthy lucre sake.' Thus had he learned of the apostle to 'make the
gospel of Christ without charge' (1 Cor 9:18); and upon this subject, they
strangely agreed. The same agreement existed between them upon the necessity of
inward light from the Holy Spirit; without which they both considered the Bible
to be a dead letter. The peculiar principle which separates the Quaker from
every other Christian community has nothing to do with the light within. Upon
that subject, all evangelical sects agreed.
The substantial difference is
whether our Lord intended the work of the ministry to be exclusively a work of
benevolence, charity, and love, binding all who are capable of using the talent
entrusted to them, to do it without worldly reward. Surely every man may be
satisfied in his own mind upon such a subject, without quarreling with, or
anathematizing each other. Bunyan and Burrough agreed, without knowing it, in
the sentiments of their illustrious and learned contemporary, John Milton, as to
the ministry being without charge; and had they, when offended, followed their
Master's rule, 'If thy brother trespasses against thee, go and tell him his fault
between thee and him along' (Matt 18:15), had they met, and on their knees
before the throne of grace, sought from heaven wisdom and charity in defending
Divine truth, we can easily imagine that the approbation of God would have been
manifested, by sending them on their important work in peaceful unity. They had
been immersed in the same deep and solemn regeneration, and their ardent object
was the same—to spread the influence of the kingdom of Christ.
No comments:
Post a Comment