At New Park Street Chapel, Southwark
Hebrews 6:4-6
Again, beloved, think
what it would necessitate to save such a man. Christ has died for him once,
yet he has fallen away and is lost; the Spirit has regenerated him once, and
that regenerating work has been of no use. God has given him a new heart (I am
only speaking, of course, on the supposition of the Apostle), he has put his
law in that heart, yet he has departed from him, contrary to the promise that
he should not; he has made him "like a shining light," but he did not
"shine more and more unto the perfect day," he shone only unto
blackness.
What next? There must be a second incarnation, a second Calvary , a second Holy
Ghost, a second regeneration, a second justification, although the first was
finished and complete—in fact, I know not what. It would necessitate the
upsetting of the whole kingdom of nature and grace, and it would, indeed, be a
world turned upside down, if after the gracious Saviour failed, he were to
attempt the work again.
If you read the 7th verse, you will see that the Apostle calls nature in to his assistance. He says, "The earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God: But that which beareth thorns and briars is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned." Look! there is a field; the rain comes on it, and it brings forth good fruit. Well, then, there is God's blessing on it.
But there is according
to your supposition, another field, on which the same rain descends, which the
same dew moistens; it has been ploughed and harrowed, as well as the other, and
the husbandman has exercised all his craft upon it, and yet it is not fertile.
Well, if the rain of heaven did not fertilize it, what next? Already all the
arts of agriculture have been tried, every implement has been worn out on its
surface, and yet it has been of no avail.
What next? There remains nothing but
that it shall be burnt and cursed—given up like the desert of Sahara , and resigned to destruction. So, my hearer, could it be
possible that grace could work in thee, and then not affect thy salvation—that
the influence of Divine grace could come down, like rain from heaven, and yet
return unto God void, there could not be any hope for thee, for thou wouldst be
"nigh unto cursing," and thine end would be "to be burned."
There is one idea which has occurred to us. It has struck us as a singular thing, that our friends should hold that men can be converted, made into new creatures, then fall away and be converted again. I am an old creature by nature; God creates me into a new thing, he makes me a new creature. I cannot go back into an old creature, for I cannot be uncreated. But yet, supposing that new creatureship of mine is not good enough to carry me to heaven. What is to come after that? Must there be something above a new creature—a new creature. Really, my friends, we have got into the country of Dreamland; but we were forced to follow our opponents into that region of absurdity, for we do not know how else to deal with them.
And one thought more. There is nothing in Scripture which teaches us that there is any salvation, save the one salvation of Jesus Christ—nothing that tells us of any other power, super-excellent and surpassing the power of the Holy Spirit. These things have already been tried on the man, and yet, according to the supposition, they have failed, for he has fallen away. Now, God has never revealed a supplementary salvation for men on whom one salvation has had no effect; and until we are pointed to one scripture which declares this, we will still maintain that the doctrine of the text is this: that if grace be ineffectual, if grace does not keep a man, then there is nothing left but that he must be damned.
And what is that but to say, only going a little round
about, that grace will do
it? So that these words, instead of miltating against the Calvinistic doctrine
of final perseverance, form one of the finest proofs of it that could be
afforded.
And
now, lastly, we come to improve
this doctrine. If Christians can fall away, and cease to be Christians,
they cannot be renewed again to repentance. "But," says one,
"You say they cannot fall away." What is the use of putting this
"if" in, like a bugbear to frighten children, or like a ghost that
can have no existence? My learned friend, "Who art thou that repliest
against God?" If God has put it in, he has put it in for wise reasons and
for excellent purposes.